Welcome to Stop The Damage. Hosted by the Brain Injury Association of NJ.

A brain injury can hap­pen to any­one at any­time. The dam­age can be long lasting…broken bones, cracked skulls, lives torn apart! Often it was from some­thing that could have been pre­vented. Our goal is to stop the damage!

Archive for prevention

The Car Care Coun­cil rec­om­mends 10 basic main­te­nance pro­ce­dures to keep your car oper­at­ing at its best:

• Check the oil, fil­ters and flu­ids. Oil should be changed per the owner’s man­ual rec­om­mended inter­vals. Your car’s fil­ters need reg­u­lar inspec­tion and replace­ment, too.

• Inspect hoses at each oil change and have them replaced when leak­ing, brit­tle, cracked, rusted, swollen or restricted.

• Check the brake sys­tem every year and have the brake lin­ings, rotors and drums inspected at each oil change.

• Check that the bat­tery con­nec­tion is clean, tight and corrosion-free. If the bat­tery is three years old or more, it should be tested and replaced if necessary.

• Inspect the exhaust sys­tem for leaks, dam­age and bro­ken sup­ports or hang­ers if there is an unusual noise. Exhaust leaks can be dan­ger­ous and must be cor­rected with­out delay.

• Sched­ule a tuneup that will help the engine deliver the best bal­ance of power and fuel econ­omy and pro­duce the low­est level of emissions.

• Check your vehicle’s heat­ing, ven­ti­lat­ing and air con­di­tion­ing sys­tem as proper heat­ing and cool­ing per­for­mance is crit­i­cal for inte­rior com­fort and for safety rea­sons, such as defrosting.

• Inspect the steer­ing and sus­pen­sion sys­tem annu­ally, includ­ing shock absorbers and struts, and chas­sis parts, such as ball joints, tie-rod ends and other related components.

• Check the pres­sure of all tires, includ­ing the spare, at least once a month. Check the tread for uneven or irreg­u­lar wear and cuts and bruises along the side­walls. Have your car’s align­ment checked at least annu­ally to reduce tire wear and improve fuel econ­omy and handling.

• Test exte­rior and inte­rior lights and have bulbs that are not work­ing checked imme­di­ately. Replace wind­shield wiper blades every six months or when cracked, cut, torn, streak­ing or chat­ter­ing for opti­mum wip­ing per­for­mance and safety.

To help you drive smart and save money, visit www.carcare.org and check out the free dig­i­tal Car Care Guide.

Rich White
Exec­u­tive Direc­tor
Car Care Coun­cil
Bethesda, Md.

Comments (0)

Car Seat Rec­om­men­da­tions for Children

  • Select a car seat based on your child’s age and size, and choose a seat that fits in
    your vehi­cle and use it every time.
  • Always refer to your spe­cific car seat manufacturer’s instruc­tions; read the vehi­cle
    owner’s man­ual on how to install the car seat using the
    seat belt or LATCH sys­tem; and check height and weight limits.
  • To max­i­mize safety, keep your child in the car seat for as long as pos­si­ble, as long as the child fits within the manufacturer’s height and weight requirements.
  • Keep your child in the back seat at least through age 12.

Birth – 12 months

Your child under age 1 should always ride in a rear-facing car seat.
There are dif­fer­ent types of rear-facing car seats: Infant-only seats can only be used rear-facing. Con­vert­ible and 3-in-1 car seats typ­i­cally have higher height and weight lim­its for the rear-facing posi­tion, allow­ing you to keep your child rear-facing for a longer period of time.

1 – 3 years

Keep your child rear-facing as long as pos­si­ble. It’s the best way to keep him or her safe. Your child should remain in a rear-facing car seat until he or she reaches the top height or weight limit allowed by your car seat’s man­u­fac­turer. Once your child out­grows the rear-facing car seat, your child is ready to travel in a forward-facing car seat with a harness.

4 – 7 years

Keep your child in a forward-facing car seat with a har­ness until he or she reaches the top height or weight limit allowed by your car seat’s man­u­fac­turer. Once your child out­grows the forward-facing car seat with a har­ness, it’s time to travel in a booster seat, but still in the back seat.

8 – 12 years

Keep your child in a booster seat until he or she is big enough to fit in a seat belt prop­erly. For a seat belt to fit prop­erly the lap belt must lie snugly across the upper thighs, not the stom­ach. The shoul­der belt should lie snug across the shoul­der and chest and not cross the neck or face.

Remem­ber: your child should still ride in the back seat because it’s safer there.

DESCRIPTION (RESTRAINT TYPE)

A REAR-FACING CAR SEAT is the best seat for your young child to use. It has a har­ness and in a crash, cra­dles and moves with your child to reduce the stress to the child’s frag­ile neck and spinal cord.

A FORWARD-FACING CAR SEAT has a har­ness and tether that lim­its your child’s for­ward move­ment dur­ing a crash.

A BOOSTER SEAT posi­tions the seat belt so that it fits prop­erly over the stronger parts of your child’s body.

A SEAT BELT should lie across the upper thighs and be snug across the shoul­der and chest to restrain the child safely in a crash. It should not rest on the stom­ach area or across the neck.


Download the 4 Steps Flyer

And what’s so wrong about that, if you’re dri­ving? You’re not hold­ing the phone, after all…

If you’ve taken a Driver’s Ed class any­time in your life (within the past cou­ple years that hands-free call­ing has actu­ally been around, at least) you’d know by now some­thing that a hor­ri­fy­ing num­ber of peo­ple don’t—hands-free phones are like a frac­tion of a per­cent less risky than hand-held to use while driving.

That makes no sense.

Yeah, that was the first thought that went through a lot of peo­ples’ brains when this rev­o­lu­tion­ary idea was first intro­duced. Why? Isn’t the big prob­lem with cell phones that you have to take your hands off the wheel to use them, and look down at the screen to text?

Well, that’s some of the prob­lem. It’s never good to drive with one hand, no mat­ter how pro you may be at doing so on a bike. How­ever, that’s not all of it. When you’re dri­ving along and talk­ing over the wire to some­one, your atten­tion strays from where it should be—the road—to the per­son that you’re talk­ing to. And unlike the per­son sit­ting next to you, the per­son on the other end of the con­nec­tion won’t know if you’re mak­ing a tricky turn or maneu­ver­ing through cars or any­thing. They won’t quiet down for you when you need to con­cen­trate, and you can’t sud­denly shut up at times to con­cen­trate or you’ll risk offense.

Imag­ine the sce­nario like this: you’re play­ing video games (COD, Black Ops, Poke­mon, what­ever) and you’re all intent on your game, when some­one decides to start talk­ing to you from the side. You’re not tak­ing your eyes or hands off the game—but your mind is, the moment you start talk­ing, and then, unless you’re a real pro gamer—GAME OVER.

Except, real life isn’t a game. So, don’t treat it as one—the cold, harsh, real­ity, is, there is no “back” or “reset” but­ton. So, treat the one life you have carefully—even more care­fully than the last life you’re on two lev­els from beat­ing a game after half a year’s worth of intense work.


SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 2011
IMPAIRED DRIVING PREVENTION CAMPAIGN
MARCH 8 — 17, 2011

Kiss me, I'm Sober!

For many Amer­i­cans, St. Patrick’s Day has become a pop­u­lar night out to cel­e­brate with friends and fam­ily.  Unfor­tu­nately, due to the large num­ber of drunk dri­vers, the night out has also become very dangerous.

On St. Patrick’s Day 2009, 37 per­cent of the dri­vers and motor­cy­clists involved in fatal crashes had a blood alco­hol con­tent (BAC) of .08 or above, accord­ing to sta­tis­tics by the National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (NHTSA).

To assist in this cam­paign, NHTSA has cre­ated this safety cam­paign plan­ner to pro­vide you with mar­ket­ing mate­r­ial, earned media tools, and mar­ket­ing ideas that you can dis­trib­ute to fit your local needs and objec­tives while, at the same time, part­ner­ing with other States, com­mu­ni­ties, and safety orga­ni­za­tions on this program.

Here we include mes­sag­ing, tem­plates, and ban­ners that you may choose from to sup­port your impaired dri­ving ini­tia­tives sur­round­ing St. Patrick’s Day. The mate­r­ial avail­able to you can be used in sev­eral capac­i­ties and all carry the tagline, “Des­ig­nate a Sober Dri­ver this St. Patrick’s Day” to rein­force our Buzzed Dri­ving is Drunk Dri­ving mes­sage plat­form.


See also:
UGotBrains.com
NJTeenDriving.com

Comments (0)

That’s exactly the response a senior friend gave to me when I asked her if she ever texted while dri­ving. It was actu­ally quite amus­ing see­ing the divide that sin­gle answer brought: the nods of agree­ment from the seniors, and the shocked, almost hor­ri­fied, faces of the sopho­mores– the sopho­mores, who had just fin­ished Dri­vers Ed. (Just to clar­ify, Dri­vers Edu­ca­tion is not a class known for teach­ing one how to drive, but rather for teach­ing one to be scared of driving.)

After a few years, or maybe even just a few months, it becomes com­mon to for­get the hor­rors we all dis­cov­ered dur­ing our Dri­vers Ed period or per­haps, as is likely in many cases, we’ve sim­ply pushed it to the back of our minds with the pop­u­lar teenage mind­set of irdc and who really does.

It’s easy to for­get cau­tion espe­cially when encour­aged by even the mere pres­ence of friends. But, truth be told, isn’t it funny how all of those nasty, cars-rolling-over-fires-exploding-people-being-ripped-apart crashes seemed to almost always hap­pen at those few moments in which peo­ple aren’t pay­ing atten­tion? Such as, those few sec­onds when you’re texting?

Let’s employ a cer­tain type of logic here. The amount of time that you’re tex­ting, or the amount of time that you’re twist­ing around to talk to some­one in the back seat, or the amount of that you’re watch­ing with fas­ci­na­tion at the amaz­ing lit­tle tri­an­gle on your wind­shield that the wipers just can’t seem to touch; it’s not very long, is it? Just a few sec­onds. At the same time, the per­cent­age of crashes that hap­pen while peo­ple are dis­tracted and not pay­ing as much atten­tion on the road as they should is scar­ily high. Well over 50%, which basi­cally means, that’s a ton of crashes. So!

That equals a really big chance that you’re going to crash dur­ing those six sec­onds. Sorry.

So, now, please don’t text and drive? Thank you.

Mid­dle­sex County man, 19, is killed in Gar­den State Park­way acci­dent in Woodbridge

It is another tragic story of some­thing that could have so eas­ily been pre­vented if only this young man had been wear­ing his seat­belt. On Tues­day night, Ahmed Faraz of Par­lin lost con­trol of his car on the Gar­den State Park­way. His vehi­cle spun around and col­lided with another vehi­cle, eject­ing Ahmed onto the hood of the other car. The other car then slammed into another vehi­cle while try­ing to avoid another col­li­sion. Some who were injured were wear­ing seat­belts. Faraz was not wear­ing his seat­belt and was killed in the crash.

Some Facts

  • Between 1975 and 2000, over 135,000 lives were saved by seat belt use, and as usage increases, traf­fic fatal­i­ties decrease.
  • Despite advanced restraint sys­tems and tough leg­is­la­tion, the National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (NHTSA) reports 25 per­cent of Amer­i­cans still fail to buckle up.
  • Seat belt usage reduces the chance of traffic-related fatal­i­ties by 45 per­cent. Accord­ing to NHTSA, in 2006 over 15,000 lives were saved by seat belt use.
  • In most cases, wear­ing a seat belt pre­vents ejec­tion from the vehi­cle. 2006 NHTSA sta­tis­tics show 75 per­cent of dri­vers ejected dur­ing a car acci­dent were killed. Only one per­cent of them were wear­ing a seat belt.
  • Wear­ing a seat belt min­i­mizes the body’s con­tact with the inte­rior of the car result­ing in fewer injuries. Accord­ing to NHTSA, seat belt usage reduces the chance of being injured by up to 50 percent.
  • Seat belts spread the force of impact over larger parts of the body reduc­ing sever­ity of injuries. Injuries sus­tained when not wear­ing a seat belt can be up to five times greater.
  • Aver­age med­ical costs for belted dri­vers are 60 per­cent less than for unbelted drivers.
Feb
04

Sobering Numbers: by Jack Bulkley

Posted by: | Comments (0)

Recently, Jack Bulk­ley (@veloreviews) wrote a brief arti­cle out­lin­ing some of the find­ings from the National High­way Traf­fic Safety Administration’s Traf­fic Safety Facts from 2009.

He wrote, “The National High­way Traf­fic Safety Administration’s Traf­fic Safety Facts 2009 divides traf­fic fatal­i­ties into three cat­e­gories: occu­pants, motor­cy­clists, and non-occupants. For 2009 in the USA, 24,747 occu­pants were killed and over 2 mil­lion injured. For motor­cy­clists the num­ber is 4,462 killed and 90,000 injured.

While the num­bers show cars and motor­cy­cles being much more of a dan­ger to them­selves and each other, there were also 4,872 non-occupants killed and 116,000 injured.

Cyclists made up 630 of the dead and 51,000 of the injured.

I don’t know what to say about these num­bers. Cer­tainly 30,000 fam­i­lies morn­ing their dead seems a high cost. I did find that around 60% of the cycling inci­dents involve rid­ing at night with­out lights. So just that one sim­ple change greatly decreases your chance of being a num­ber in a future report.”

Jack Bulk­ley writes on many dif­fer­ent top­ics and all of his arti­cles are a joy to read. Go get involved on his blog HERE.

Also see:

Categories : Highway, prevention
Comments (0)

On Fri­day, Jan­u­ary 28, Road War­rior Colum­nist John Cichowski wrote a great arti­cle regard­ing the big news that teen dri­ving deaths are down 44% in 2010 and that it could be “attrib­uted to the May 1 teen dri­ving restric­tions that included an 11 p.m. cur­few, pas­sen­ger lim­its, a ban on hands-free cell­phone use, and a tiny, man­dated red bumper decal to iden­tify novice dri­vers under the state’s Grad­u­ated Dri­ver License law.”

You can read the full arti­cle HERE

Comments (0)

Fam­ily raises aware­ness of Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion and tex­ting risks on ABC’s Extreme Makeover: Home Edition

by Press Releases for U.S. Depart­ment of Transportation’s (USDOT)

WASHINGTON – U.S. Trans­porta­tion Sec­re­tary Ray LaHood (@RayLaHood) today released the lat­est video in the U.S. Depart­ment of Transportation’s (USDOT) “Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving series. The new video fea­tures the Brown fam­ily, whose 17-year-old daugh­ter, Alex, was killed in a 2009 crash because she was tex­ting while dri­ving on a rural road in Well­man, Texas. The fam­ily recently appeared on ABC’s Extreme Makeover: Home Edi­tion, rais­ing aware­ness of the Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion and the dan­gers of dis­tracted driving.

<div align=“center” style=“text-align=“center; padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;”>

WATCH: “Alex Brown, 17”


Watch on YouTube

Alex Brown wasn’t a sta­tis­tic – she was a beloved daugh­ter and a sis­ter, and her death left a hole in the heart of her fam­ily mem­bers and friends,” said Sec­re­tary LaHood. “I hope that every­one who hears the Brown fam­ily speak about their tragic loss will real­ize that no text mes­sage or phone call is worth the risk. Addi­tional media atten­tion, like ABC’s help­ing share the Browns’ story with the view­ers of Extreme Makeover: Home Edi­tion, is also vital.”

She’s a huge part of our lives that’s just gone,” said Jeanne Brown. “But maybe we can reach one young per­son or help keep some­one else’s daugh­ter from doing this.”

Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving” is a video series explor­ing the tragic con­se­quences of tex­ting and cell phone use while dri­ving. It fea­tures peo­ple from across the coun­try who have been injured or lost loved ones in dis­tracted dri­ving crashes. In 2009, nearly 5,500 peo­ple died and half a mil­lion were injured in acci­dents involv­ing a dis­tracted dri­ver. The series is part of Sec­re­tary LaHood’s effort to raise greater aware­ness about the dan­gers of dis­tracted driving.

USDOT is also encour­ag­ing oth­ers who would like to share their dis­tracted dri­ving expe­ri­ences to post videos on YouTube and email the links to: faces@distraction.gov.

The department’s cam­paign against dis­tracted dri­ving is a multi-modal effort that includes auto­mo­biles, trains, planes, and com­mer­cial vehicles.

The Fed­eral Rail­road Admin­is­tra­tion (FRA) issued a rule pro­hibit­ing rail employ­ees from using cell phones or other elec­tronic devices on the job fol­low­ing a Sep­tem­ber 2008 Metrolink crash in Chatsworth, Cal­i­for­nia that killed 25 people.

After a North­west flight crew dis­tracted by a lap­top over­shot their des­ti­na­tion by 150 miles, the Fed­eral Avi­a­tion Admin­is­tra­tion (FAA) advised air car­ri­ers to cre­ate and enforce poli­cies that limit dis­trac­tions in the cock­pit and keep pilots focused on trans­port­ing pas­sen­gers safely.

The Fed­eral Motor Car­rier Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (FMCSA) issued a rule pro­hibit­ing text mes­sag­ing while oper­at­ing a com­mer­cial motor vehi­cle in Sep­tem­ber 2010. In Decem­ber 2010, FMCSA issued a pro­posal to restrict the use of cell phones by com­mer­cial dri­vers while oper­at­ing. A rule­mak­ing pro­posed by the a href=“http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/” target=“blank”>Pipeline and Haz­ardous Mate­ri­als Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (PHMSA) in Sep­tem­ber 2010 to work in con­junc­tion with the FMCSA ban would restrict the use of elec­tronic devices by dri­vers dur­ing the oper­a­tion of a motor vehi­cle con­tain­ing haz­ardous mate­ri­als. The pub­lic is invited to com­ment on the pro­posed rulemaking.

To learn more about USDOT’s efforts to stop dis­tracted dri­ving, please visit www.distraction.gov.

PLEASE WATCH & SHARE: the entire “Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving” series @ www.distraction.gov/faces.
“Dis­tracted Dri­ving Kills. Safe Dri­ving Starts With YOU.”

The Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion (RAB) hon­ors Alex’s mem­ory by edu­cat­ing oth­ers about the dan­gers of tex­ting while dri­ving. Their web­site encour­ages oth­ers to share their dis­tracted dri­ving sto­ries and pledge online not to text while oper­at­ing a vehicle.

You can learn more about The Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion at www.rememberalexbrownfoundation.org.

Remember Alex Brown - CLICK TO take the pledge to NOT text and drive

Remem­ber Alex Brown — CLICK TO take the pledge to NOT text and drive

by Press Releases for National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (NHTSA)

WALTHAM, MA – U.S. Trans­porta­tion Sec­re­tary Ray LaHood (@RayLaHood) and National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tor David Strick­land (@NHTSAgov) today took a first look at new Dri­ver Alco­hol Detec­tion Sys­tem for Safety (DADSS) tech­nol­ogy being devel­oped to pre­vent alcohol-impaired dri­vers from oper­at­ing their vehi­cles while under the influence.

Sec­re­tary LaHood and Admin­is­tra­tor Strick­land were joined by Shane Karr, vice pres­i­dent for Fed­eral Gov­ern­ment Affairs at the Alliance of Auto­mo­bile Man­u­fac­tur­ers, and Laura Dean Mooney (@maddnatlpres), national pres­i­dent of Moth­ers Against Drunk Dri­ving (MADD) (@maddonline), and JD Crouch, pres­i­dent of Qine­tiQ North America’s Tech­nol­ogy Solu­tions Group (@QinetiQNorthAm) for a demon­stra­tion of DADSS tech­nol­ogy at the Qine­tiQ lab where it is under devel­op­ment in Waltham, Massachusetts.

While still in the devel­op­men­tal stages, DADSS is seen as a poten­tial tool for keep­ing drunk dri­vers from being able oper­ate their car if their blood alco­hol con­cen­tra­tion is at or above the legal intox­i­ca­tion limit (.08 BAC or higher). The tech­nol­ogy could be vol­un­tar­ily installed as an option for new cars. One sys­tem under eval­u­a­tion deter­mines the blood alco­hol con­cen­tra­tion through a touch-based approach and another sys­tem uses a breath-based approach.

NHTSA research shows that dri­vers involved in fatal acci­dents with blood alco­hol lev­els above the .08 legal limit are eight times more likely to have had a prior con­vic­tion for impaired dri­ving than dri­vers who had no alco­hol in their bod­ies at the time of a wreck.

Drunk dri­ving con­tin­ues to be a national tragedy that need­lessly claims the lives of thou­sands of peo­ple on our high­ways each year,” said Sec­re­tary LaHood. “We need to put an end to it.”

MADD Pres­i­dent Laura Dean-Mooney, who was left a widow and sin­gle mother when a drunk dri­ver killed her hus­band, Mike Dean, wel­comed the progress of the DADSS research effort, say­ing, “Auto mak­ers have stepped up to help turn cars into the cure. This project has made sub­stan­tial progress and this tech­nol­ogy could one day be an impor­tant step in our efforts to elim­i­nate drunk dri­ving.”

DADSS is being devel­oped under a five-year, $10 mil­lion coop­er­a­tive ini­tia­tive between NHTSA and the Auto­mo­tive Coali­tion for Traf­fic Safety (ACTS), an indus­try group rep­re­sent­ing most of the world’s auto makers.

What we’re doing is devel­op­ing tech­nol­ogy that won’t inter­fere with sober dri­vers, will require vir­tu­ally no main­te­nance or upkeep and will have such pre­ci­sion that it only stops a dri­ver when their blood alco­hol con­tent is .08 BAC or higher, which is the ille­gal limit for drunk dri­ving in every state,” said Shane Karr. “Now that we have actual pro­to­types, a tremen­dous feat in itself, we’ll be work­ing to iden­tify the gaps in per­for­mance between these pro­to­types and the pre­cise stan­dards we’ve iden­ti­fied as true tech­nol­ogy require­ments. This will point the way for­ward for the next phase of research.”

The tech­nol­ogy we are see­ing here today could quite sim­ply sig­nal a new fron­tier in the fight against drunk dri­ving,” said NHTSA Admin­is­tra­tor Strickland.

The next stage of devel­op­ment, which would include prac­ti­cal demon­stra­tions of one or more of the alco­hol detec­tion tech­nolo­gies, could begin later this year.

What­ever the future holds for these advanced drunk dri­ving pre­ven­tion tech­nolo­gies, one thing remains clear; no tech­nol­ogy can, or should, ever replace a driver’s per­sonal respon­si­bil­ity not to drive drunk,” the Admin­is­tra­tor said.

In 2009, 10,839 peo­ple died nation­wide in crashes involv­ing a drunk dri­ver.
These deaths make up 32 per­cent of all fatal crashes.

• Click here for addi­tional infor­ma­tion about DADDs

• Click here for statistics: