Welcome to Stop The Damage. Hosted by the Brain Injury Association of NJ.

A brain injury can hap­pen to any­one at any­time. The dam­age can be long lasting…broken bones, cracked skulls, lives torn apart! Often it was from some­thing that could have been pre­vented. Our goal is to stop the damage!

Archive for New Laws

Fam­ily raises aware­ness of Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion and tex­ting risks on ABC’s Extreme Makeover: Home Edition

by Press Releases for U.S. Depart­ment of Transportation’s (USDOT)

WASHINGTON – U.S. Trans­porta­tion Sec­re­tary Ray LaHood (@RayLaHood) today released the lat­est video in the U.S. Depart­ment of Transportation’s (USDOT) “Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving series. The new video fea­tures the Brown fam­ily, whose 17-year-old daugh­ter, Alex, was killed in a 2009 crash because she was tex­ting while dri­ving on a rural road in Well­man, Texas. The fam­ily recently appeared on ABC’s Extreme Makeover: Home Edi­tion, rais­ing aware­ness of the Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion and the dan­gers of dis­tracted driving.

<div align=“center” style=“text-align=“center; padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;”>

WATCH: “Alex Brown, 17”


Watch on YouTube

Alex Brown wasn’t a sta­tis­tic – she was a beloved daugh­ter and a sis­ter, and her death left a hole in the heart of her fam­ily mem­bers and friends,” said Sec­re­tary LaHood. “I hope that every­one who hears the Brown fam­ily speak about their tragic loss will real­ize that no text mes­sage or phone call is worth the risk. Addi­tional media atten­tion, like ABC’s help­ing share the Browns’ story with the view­ers of Extreme Makeover: Home Edi­tion, is also vital.”

She’s a huge part of our lives that’s just gone,” said Jeanne Brown. “But maybe we can reach one young per­son or help keep some­one else’s daugh­ter from doing this.”

Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving” is a video series explor­ing the tragic con­se­quences of tex­ting and cell phone use while dri­ving. It fea­tures peo­ple from across the coun­try who have been injured or lost loved ones in dis­tracted dri­ving crashes. In 2009, nearly 5,500 peo­ple died and half a mil­lion were injured in acci­dents involv­ing a dis­tracted dri­ver. The series is part of Sec­re­tary LaHood’s effort to raise greater aware­ness about the dan­gers of dis­tracted driving.

USDOT is also encour­ag­ing oth­ers who would like to share their dis­tracted dri­ving expe­ri­ences to post videos on YouTube and email the links to: faces@distraction.gov.

The department’s cam­paign against dis­tracted dri­ving is a multi-modal effort that includes auto­mo­biles, trains, planes, and com­mer­cial vehicles.

The Fed­eral Rail­road Admin­is­tra­tion (FRA) issued a rule pro­hibit­ing rail employ­ees from using cell phones or other elec­tronic devices on the job fol­low­ing a Sep­tem­ber 2008 Metrolink crash in Chatsworth, Cal­i­for­nia that killed 25 people.

After a North­west flight crew dis­tracted by a lap­top over­shot their des­ti­na­tion by 150 miles, the Fed­eral Avi­a­tion Admin­is­tra­tion (FAA) advised air car­ri­ers to cre­ate and enforce poli­cies that limit dis­trac­tions in the cock­pit and keep pilots focused on trans­port­ing pas­sen­gers safely.

The Fed­eral Motor Car­rier Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (FMCSA) issued a rule pro­hibit­ing text mes­sag­ing while oper­at­ing a com­mer­cial motor vehi­cle in Sep­tem­ber 2010. In Decem­ber 2010, FMCSA issued a pro­posal to restrict the use of cell phones by com­mer­cial dri­vers while oper­at­ing. A rule­mak­ing pro­posed by the a href=“http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/” target=“blank”>Pipeline and Haz­ardous Mate­ri­als Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (PHMSA) in Sep­tem­ber 2010 to work in con­junc­tion with the FMCSA ban would restrict the use of elec­tronic devices by dri­vers dur­ing the oper­a­tion of a motor vehi­cle con­tain­ing haz­ardous mate­ri­als. The pub­lic is invited to com­ment on the pro­posed rulemaking.

To learn more about USDOT’s efforts to stop dis­tracted dri­ving, please visit www.distraction.gov.

PLEASE WATCH & SHARE: the entire “Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving” series @ www.distraction.gov/faces.
“Dis­tracted Dri­ving Kills. Safe Dri­ving Starts With YOU.”

The Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion (RAB) hon­ors Alex’s mem­ory by edu­cat­ing oth­ers about the dan­gers of tex­ting while dri­ving. Their web­site encour­ages oth­ers to share their dis­tracted dri­ving sto­ries and pledge online not to text while oper­at­ing a vehicle.

You can learn more about The Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion at www.rememberalexbrownfoundation.org.

Remember Alex Brown - CLICK TO take the pledge to NOT text and drive

Remem­ber Alex Brown — CLICK TO take the pledge to NOT text and drive

by Press Releases for National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (NHTSA)

WALTHAM, MA – U.S. Trans­porta­tion Sec­re­tary Ray LaHood (@RayLaHood) and National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tor David Strick­land (@NHTSAgov) today took a first look at new Dri­ver Alco­hol Detec­tion Sys­tem for Safety (DADSS) tech­nol­ogy being devel­oped to pre­vent alcohol-impaired dri­vers from oper­at­ing their vehi­cles while under the influence.

Sec­re­tary LaHood and Admin­is­tra­tor Strick­land were joined by Shane Karr, vice pres­i­dent for Fed­eral Gov­ern­ment Affairs at the Alliance of Auto­mo­bile Man­u­fac­tur­ers, and Laura Dean Mooney (@maddnatlpres), national pres­i­dent of Moth­ers Against Drunk Dri­ving (MADD) (@maddonline), and JD Crouch, pres­i­dent of Qine­tiQ North America’s Tech­nol­ogy Solu­tions Group (@QinetiQNorthAm) for a demon­stra­tion of DADSS tech­nol­ogy at the Qine­tiQ lab where it is under devel­op­ment in Waltham, Massachusetts.

While still in the devel­op­men­tal stages, DADSS is seen as a poten­tial tool for keep­ing drunk dri­vers from being able oper­ate their car if their blood alco­hol con­cen­tra­tion is at or above the legal intox­i­ca­tion limit (.08 BAC or higher). The tech­nol­ogy could be vol­un­tar­ily installed as an option for new cars. One sys­tem under eval­u­a­tion deter­mines the blood alco­hol con­cen­tra­tion through a touch-based approach and another sys­tem uses a breath-based approach.

NHTSA research shows that dri­vers involved in fatal acci­dents with blood alco­hol lev­els above the .08 legal limit are eight times more likely to have had a prior con­vic­tion for impaired dri­ving than dri­vers who had no alco­hol in their bod­ies at the time of a wreck.

Drunk dri­ving con­tin­ues to be a national tragedy that need­lessly claims the lives of thou­sands of peo­ple on our high­ways each year,” said Sec­re­tary LaHood. “We need to put an end to it.”

MADD Pres­i­dent Laura Dean-Mooney, who was left a widow and sin­gle mother when a drunk dri­ver killed her hus­band, Mike Dean, wel­comed the progress of the DADSS research effort, say­ing, “Auto mak­ers have stepped up to help turn cars into the cure. This project has made sub­stan­tial progress and this tech­nol­ogy could one day be an impor­tant step in our efforts to elim­i­nate drunk dri­ving.”

DADSS is being devel­oped under a five-year, $10 mil­lion coop­er­a­tive ini­tia­tive between NHTSA and the Auto­mo­tive Coali­tion for Traf­fic Safety (ACTS), an indus­try group rep­re­sent­ing most of the world’s auto makers.

What we’re doing is devel­op­ing tech­nol­ogy that won’t inter­fere with sober dri­vers, will require vir­tu­ally no main­te­nance or upkeep and will have such pre­ci­sion that it only stops a dri­ver when their blood alco­hol con­tent is .08 BAC or higher, which is the ille­gal limit for drunk dri­ving in every state,” said Shane Karr. “Now that we have actual pro­to­types, a tremen­dous feat in itself, we’ll be work­ing to iden­tify the gaps in per­for­mance between these pro­to­types and the pre­cise stan­dards we’ve iden­ti­fied as true tech­nol­ogy require­ments. This will point the way for­ward for the next phase of research.”

The tech­nol­ogy we are see­ing here today could quite sim­ply sig­nal a new fron­tier in the fight against drunk dri­ving,” said NHTSA Admin­is­tra­tor Strickland.

The next stage of devel­op­ment, which would include prac­ti­cal demon­stra­tions of one or more of the alco­hol detec­tion tech­nolo­gies, could begin later this year.

What­ever the future holds for these advanced drunk dri­ving pre­ven­tion tech­nolo­gies, one thing remains clear; no tech­nol­ogy can, or should, ever replace a driver’s per­sonal respon­si­bil­ity not to drive drunk,” the Admin­is­tra­tor said.

In 2009, 10,839 peo­ple died nation­wide in crashes involv­ing a drunk dri­ver.
These deaths make up 32 per­cent of all fatal crashes.

• Click here for addi­tional infor­ma­tion about DADDs

• Click here for statistics:

By Megan DeMarco/Statehouse Bureau

Jerry McCrea/The Star-Ledger

New Jersey’s dri­ver safety laws make the Gar­den State one of the safest in the nation for motorists, a report released today finds.

The state ranks sec­ond only to the Dis­trict of Colum­bia, accord­ing to the high­way safety report released by Advo­cates for Auto and High­way Safety.

New Jer­sey had 583 fatal­i­ties related to auto acci­dents in 2009, and crashes cost the state $9.3 billion.

The states were ranked on laws address­ing seat belts and other pro­tec­tion for adults, dis­tracted driving/text mes­sag­ing, impaired dri­ving, teen dri­ving, and child pro­tec­tion laws.

New Jer­sey met almost every require­ment, except a law requir­ing 30–50 hours of super­vised
dri­ving for teenagers.

The state got half credit for the require­ment that teenage dri­vers be pro­hib­ited from dri­ving from at least 10 p.m to 5 a.m., and half credit for not requir­ing an igni­tion inter­lock for all drunken dri­ving offenders.

New Jer­sey is one of the highest-spending states when it comes to the finan­cial bur­den of car crashes, the report found. In New Jer­sey, $9.3 bil­lion goes toward the eco­nomic cost of vehi­cle crashes. Only Florida, Cal­i­for­nia, New York and Texas spend more.

Nation­wide, more than 33,800 peo­ple were killed in motor vehi­cle crashes in 2009, the report found, and more than 2.2 mil­lion peo­ple were injured.

Eleven per­cent of dri­vers involved in fatal crashes dur­ing the same time were teen dri­vers
between 15 and 20.

The report also found auto acci­dents sig­nif­i­cantly decrease dur­ing eco­nomic recessions.

(LOCAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS) are remind­ing motorists to always remove accu­mu­lated ice and snow from their vehi­cles before trav­el­ing on New Jersey’s roadways.

Motorists who fail to clear their vehi­cles of ice and snow before dri­ving can be cited and fined under an amended law, which became effec­tive Octo­ber 20, 2010. Prior to this change, a motorist could only receive a cita­tion if fail­ure to remove ice and snow from a vehi­cle resulted in injury to oth­ers or prop­erty damage.

Fines for vio­lat­ing the new law range from $25 to $75. No motor vehi­cle points will be assessed for this offense. If fail­ure to remove ice and snow results in injury or prop­erty dam­age, motorists face fines rang­ing from $200 to $1000, while com­mer­cial motor vehi­cle dri­vers face fines rang­ing from $500 to $1,500, for each offense.

In antic­i­pa­tion of inclement weather, motorists are encour­aged to:

  • Tune up and win­ter­ize their vehi­cles, as well as check the radi­a­tor, bat­tery, antifreeze, and all other fluid levels.
  • Check tire treads and replace them if they’re unsafe.
  • Check and replace wind­shield wiper blades if the rub­ber is cracked and/or brit­tle. Be sure to also check and refill the washer fluid reservoir.
  • Main­tain at least a half a tank of gas dur­ing the win­ter to pre­vent the fuel line from freezing.

Motorists should also keep a win­ter dri­ving “safety kit” in their vehi­cles that is eas­ily acces­si­ble in the event of an emer­gency. The kit should include: an ice scraper/brush; shovel; jumper cables or bat­tery starter; warm blan­ket; sand, salt or cat lit­ter (for trac­tion in ice and snow); de-icer; safety flares/warning devices; flash­light and new bat­ter­ies; extra wind­shield washer fluid; cell phone with a charged spare bat­tery; water and non-perishable food (i.e. gra­nola or pro­tein bars); and, paper tow­els or a cloth.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion on win­ter dri­ving, as well as a vari­ety of traf­fic safety issues, motorists can visit the New Jer­sey Divi­sion of High­way Traf­fic Safety’s web site, at www.njsaferoads.com

Comments (0)

Given the fact most kids wear hel­mets while bike rid­ing, it prob­a­bly seems sur­pris­ing to some that wear­ing a hel­met while ski­ing is not required in New Jer­sey for teenages.

A bipar­ti­san bill co-sponsored by Assem­bly­man Anthony M. Bucco, R-Boonton, is try­ing to change that. The bill, which was released from com­mit­tee last week, would require any­one under the age of 18 to wear a hel­met while ski­ing or snowboarding.

A recent study by…read more…

National Teen Dri­ver Safety Week is Octo­ber 17–24

Every­one knows that young peo­ple are the future of the Nation, but
it’s becom­ing increas­ingly clear that the future of young peo­ple on the
Nation’s high­ways isn’t quite so rosy. This is par­tic­u­larly true with
the growth in pop­u­lar­ity of all man­ner of elec­tronic devices that are
vying for the atten­tion of young dri­vers over the act of dri­ving itself.

First, the bad news: Accord­ing to the U. S Depart­ment of
Transportation’s National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (NHTSA),
in 2008, more than 3,750 teens ages 15 through 19 died in auto­mo­bile
crashes of all types, and almost 660, or 18 per­cent, of those were
killed in crashes involv­ing some form of dis­tracted dri­ving.
All told, 4,457 teen dri­vers ages 15 to 19 were involved in fatal
crashes in 2008, and 16 per­cent (692) were dis­tracted at the time of the
crash.

And while dis­tracted dri­ving comes in many forms, from tex­ting and
talk­ing on a cell phone, to eat­ing and play­ing with a radio, CD player,
or MP3 device, all too often the result is tragic. In 2008, that
tragedy was played out nearly 800 times on America’s highways—that’s the
num­ber of peo­ple killed in crashes that involved a dis­tracted teen
driver.

While no one is exempt from dri­ving dis­trac­tions offered by the
elec­tronic giz­mos they are bring­ing with them into their vehi­cles, teens
seem to be par­tic­u­larly sus­cep­ti­ble to the siren call of tex­ting.
A study by the Pew Research Center’s Inter­net & Amer­i­can Life Project
reported that nearly half of the teens inter­viewed reported that they
had been in a vehi­cle while the dri­ver texted. All told, one in three
teens told Pew researchers that they had texted while driving.

Now for the good news: Over­all, teen dri­ving deaths and involve­ment in
fatal crashes have been declin­ing over the last decade. In 2008,
accord­ing to fig­ures from NHTSA, 15– to 20-year-old dri­vers involved in
fatal crashes dropped 27 per­cent com­pared to 1998. Dri­ver fatal­i­ties
for this age group also dropped by 20 per­cent over the same 10-year
period.

While it is impos­si­ble to pin­point a sin­gle rea­son for these declines,
youth dri­ving pro­grams like Grad­u­ated Dri­ver Licens­ing are cer­tainly
hav­ing a pro­found and pos­i­tive effect on sav­ing young lives on the
high­ways. Also, NHTSA antic­i­pates that anti-texting laws and strong
police enforce­ment may also con­tribute to help­ing save teen lives. In
the first six months of 2010, no fewer than 30 States have passed
leg­is­la­tion out­law­ing tex­ting while driving.

In addi­tion, aware­ness pro­grams like National Teen Dri­ver Safety Week
are help­ing to edu­cate both par­ents and teens alike about this impor­tant
safety issue nation­wide. This year, National Teen Dri­ver Safety Week is
Octo­ber 17–24.

For more infor­ma­tion about teen dri­ving safety, please visit
www.ugotbrains.com and www.njteendriving.com

Comments (0)
Sep
05

You cant make this stuff up!

Posted by: | Comments (0)

A hus­band and wife were arrested Sun­day and charged with dri­ving while intox­i­cated after the vehi­cle their child in was stopped at a check­point, East Fishkill Police said.

Offi­cers at a check­point oper­ated between mid­night and 5 a.m. Sun­day stopped a vehi­cle after observ­ing mar­i­juana para­phena­lia inside, police said. The vehi­cle was occu­pied by two 18-year-old boys and two 15-year-old girls, all of whom live in Hopewell Junction

Par­ents of all four teens were called to pick up their chil­dren, but the 46-year-old mother of one of them was observed to be intox­i­cated upon her arrival, police said. The 46-year-old was arrested and the teen-ager was released to another adult at the scene, police said.

Two hours later, the same child’s father, a 45-year-old Hopewell Junc­tion res­i­dent, drove through the check­point and was observed to be intox­i­cated, police said.

He was arrested and both par­ents were charged with dri­ving while intox­i­cated, a mis­de­meanor, police said.

Comments (0)
Aug
25

My Story About Teen Driving

Posted by: | Comments (1)

Hello my name is Donna Weeks, thank you for let­ting me share my story with you today and hope­fully this infor­ma­tion will help you and your fam­ily and friends.

On Decem­ber 21, 2006 I lost my incred­i­ble daugh­ter, Kyleigh Lau­ren D’Alessio, who was killed in a hor­ri­ble pre­ventable car acci­dent. The newly 17 year old dri­ver also died in the acci­dent. He just received his Grad­u­ate Dri­vers Licenses and had mul­ti­ple pas­sen­gers in the car. I didn’t know much at that time about the Grad­u­ate Dri­vers License/Provisional Dri­vers License because Kyleigh was only 16 years old and was my old­est child.

After the acci­dent I looked up the GDL and other web­sites for teen dri­vers. With the infor­ma­tion I was find­ing I thought. “Why isn’t this cru­cial infor­ma­tion given to par­ents about the laws of the GDL?” When their teen receives their per­mit and pro­vi­sional license.

After Kyleigh’s acci­dent, there were fatal car acci­dents every week for the next 5 weeks. We lost 11 teens at that time all GDL dri­vers with mul­ti­ple pas­sen­gers. I thought, “Why aren’t these cars marked?” “Why isn’t infor­ma­tion given to par­ents about the Grad­u­ated Driver’s License Laws (GDL)?” With the infor­ma­tion I found on teen dri­vers I could no longer do noth­ing. We are los­ing to many pre­cious lives because of cru­cial infor­ma­tion not pro­vide and the GDL not enforceable.

Teen Dri­ving Awareness

• The #1 Killer of teens – car crashes — nationwide

• The num­ber of teens that are killed in car acci­dents should no longer be accepted.

• The biggest threat to teens is parked just out­side your home.

• Pre­ventable car acci­dents caused by teen dri­vers are the lead­ing cause of death for teens in Amer­ica today.

The Tragic Facts

• Nearly 5,000 teenagers die in car crashes every year.

• Another 300,000 plus are injured in car crashes each year.

• Our chil­dren are irre­place­able and if we could share some extremely impor­tant infor­ma­tion for par­ents and teens to help them make bet­ter choices, believe me its worth every second

Aware­ness — Think Smart

• Mak­ing Teens More Aware of the Dan­gers of Teen Driving

• You have the power to pro­tect you and your friend’s lives.

• If you were aware that one deci­sion that you made while dri­ving could increase the like­li­hood that you could get into a crash, wouldn’t you make the choice to pre­vent it? Be aware! Save your life and the peo­ple you love.

• These sta­tis­tics should be unac­cept­able to you as teenagers because most of these acci­dents are preventable:

Research has shown that the first 6 months of a newly GDL/provisional dri­ver is the most dan­ger­ous, and being a pas­sen­ger is also dan­ger­ous, and some­times fatal.

I am sure that most par­ents are unaware of the fact that research shows that 3 out of 4 teens state that their par­ents have the biggest influ­ence on their driving.

Know­ing the laws (and sta­tis­tic) in your state for newly teen dri­vers is empow­er­ing. As a par­ent that was not pro­vided with this nec­es­sary infor­ma­tion, at the most crit­i­cal time of my daughter’s life, I feel is extremely impor­tant for pro­vid­ing par­ents with the under­stand­ing and knowl­edge of many sta­tis­tics of the dan­gers of teen driving.

A sim­ple ques­tion like, “can I ride to school with Johnny this morn­ing”, Johnny being the 17 year old neigh­bor who has just received his GDL/Provisional license last week. With­out the par­ents receiv­ing the infor­ma­tion this sim­ple ques­tion has turned into a life threat­en­ing one and could pos­si­bly be the last deci­sion this par­ent may make for their child.

It is time we start to make a dif­fer­ence, know­ing now after so much recent research that a high per­cent­age of these acci­dents are preventable.

I hope this gen­er­a­tion of teen dri­vers as they are edu­cated and are more aware of the dan­ger­ous against them – is the gen­er­a­tion that will accept these changes for them­selves and their friends and start the turn­ing point of sta­tis­tics against them.

I know what it feels like to loss an incred­i­ble child and I don’t want another fam­ily to have to live though the pain that my fam­ily and friends will for the rest of our lives.

Kyleigh’s incred­i­ble spirit and energy for life and love for life is what gave us strength. If I only had to use one word to describe her, the word would be JOY just pure JOY. We miss every­thing about her.

Web­sites I found that were informational:

Comments (1)

Do I really need to wear a seat­belt in the backseat?????

Sim­ply put, the answer is yes.  Yes because it is the law in New Jer­sey and yes because it can save your life.  Accord­ing to Pam Fis­cher, Direc­tor of New Jer­sey Divi­sion of High­way Traf­fic Safety, “Peo­ple some­times say using seat belts should not be manda­tory, but a mat­ter of indi­vid­ual choice, but this isn’t about that,” said Fis­cher. “This is about safety. The risk to your life is three times greater if you don’t wear a belt, and the costs for deaths, injuries and acci­dents come back to all of us in the form of higher insur­ance rates.”  Read more about this at NJBackseatBullets.com

Think it can’t hap­pen to you???

Two recent deaths which may have been pre­vented with the use of a seat­belt.  Be safe.  Be smart. Buckle up.  It’s the law and it could save your life.

Fatal crash-both occu­pants unbelted:   http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/breaking/article_c9615a3a-9d94-11df-b809-001cc4c03286.html

Another fatal crash: unbelted back­seat pas­sen­ger + inex­pe­ri­ence: http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/breaking/article_29831142-9cd2-11df-8968-001cc4c03286.html

Comments (1)

Seniors and Dri­ving:  Are They Safe?

There is often a lot of talk about the safety of seniors behind the wheel.  Some have argued that seniors make up the most dan­ger­ous age group of dri­vers.  Oth­ers stated that instead of man­dat­ing teens to dis­play decals, the senior dri­vers should be iden­ti­fied on the road­ways.  How­ever, accord­ing to recent stud­ies, seniors may be the SAFEST dri­vers on the roads.

Researchers say a dri­ver 70 or older is three times less likely to be killed in a crash than those 35 to 54.  Read more about senior dri­vers at

Older dri­vers safer: http://www.northjersey.com/news/state/99709069_Judge_drivers_by_ability__not_age.html