Welcome to Stop The Damage. Hosted by the Brain Injury Association of NJ.

A brain injury can hap­pen to any­one at any­time. The dam­age can be long lasting…broken bones, cracked skulls, lives torn apart! Often it was from some­thing that could have been pre­vented. Our goal is to stop the damage!

Archive for prevention

As you’ll likely know by now, U Got Brains is hold­ing a statewide com­pe­ti­tion between nine­teen “cham­pion” schools in New Jer­sey, with each school cre­at­ing a cam­paign to pro­mote safe dri­ving. And fun­nily enough, teens in the schools are begin­ning to actu­ally take notice.

For some, it’s just a ques­tion of ask­ing another friend—“wait what’s up with all the sud­den fly­ers?” and for oth­ers, it’s the gift of a free shirt or bracelet from a cam­paign orga­nizer; but grad­u­ally, the stu­dents in the schools are start­ing to real­ize that this is a big deal— and it’s actu­ally hap­pen­ing at their school.

Adults can come in and teach stu­dents about safe dri­ving all they want. Some speeches are funny or witty, while oth­ers can be elo­quent, touch­ing, or pow­er­ful. But no mat­ter how won­der­ful their speeches are, many stu­dents just don’t lis­ten. Maybe they’ll lis­ten for the period, maybe they’ll lis­ten for a few days—but even­tu­ally, the major­ity will go back to the far eas­ier meth­ods of tex­ting out quick replies, fore­go­ing the annoy­ing seat belt, and tak­ing that ille­gal drink at parties.

How­ever, imag­ine the con­cepts of dri­ving in full con­trol becom­ing the new trend. Of stu­dents hit­ting friends over the heads (not lit­er­ally! …well, depend­ing on how close the friend is) for dri­ving idi­ot­i­cally, friends telling friends “I love you but I’d really rather not risk my life on your skills at look­ing at the road and at your phone at the same time”, upper­class­men cre­at­ing prece­dents that the under­class­men won’t dare to break in the future—essentially, keep­ing smart in and stu­pid out.

We can do this, and the U Got Brains com­pe­ti­tion is one step towards this goal, this hope. If teenagers become the ones to spread the word and tell each other exactly how stu­pid stu­pid is, then they stand the chance of actu­ally being heard and even lis­tened to by peers. We as teens have adopted plenty of strange ideas in the past—so why not adopt a life-saving one, this time, instead?

> Find out what the UGot­Brains Cham­pion School Project is and see who is participating

On Tues­day, a three-judge appeals court upheld the dis­pu­ta­tious Kyleigh’s Law, part of the Grad­u­ated Driver’s License Sys­tem (GDLS) that requires new dri­vers, under age 21, to dis­play one red decal in the top, left cor­ner of both the front and rear license plates.

The Asso­ci­ated Press reported that the par­ents of two Mor­ris County teenagers filed a law­suit chal­leng­ing the law, which went into effect in May 2010, argu­ing it would unfairly tar­get young dri­vers to crim­i­nals and sex­ual preda­tors in addi­tion to law enforcement.

Read the entire story here

Find out every­thing you need to know about GDL law in New Jer­sey @ http://www.njteendriving.com/gdl

Categories : Highway, New Laws, Teen
Comments (1)

Mid­dle­sex County man, 19, is killed in Gar­den State Park­way acci­dent in Woodbridge

It is another tragic story of some­thing that could have so eas­ily been pre­vented if only this young man had been wear­ing his seat­belt. On Tues­day night, Ahmed Faraz of Par­lin lost con­trol of his car on the Gar­den State Park­way. His vehi­cle spun around and col­lided with another vehi­cle, eject­ing Ahmed onto the hood of the other car. The other car then slammed into another vehi­cle while try­ing to avoid another col­li­sion. Some who were injured were wear­ing seat­belts. Faraz was not wear­ing his seat­belt and was killed in the crash.

Some Facts

  • Between 1975 and 2000, over 135,000 lives were saved by seat belt use, and as usage increases, traf­fic fatal­i­ties decrease.
  • Despite advanced restraint sys­tems and tough leg­is­la­tion, the National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (NHTSA) reports 25 per­cent of Amer­i­cans still fail to buckle up.
  • Seat belt usage reduces the chance of traffic-related fatal­i­ties by 45 per­cent. Accord­ing to NHTSA, in 2006 over 15,000 lives were saved by seat belt use.
  • In most cases, wear­ing a seat belt pre­vents ejec­tion from the vehi­cle. 2006 NHTSA sta­tis­tics show 75 per­cent of dri­vers ejected dur­ing a car acci­dent were killed. Only one per­cent of them were wear­ing a seat belt.
  • Wear­ing a seat belt min­i­mizes the body’s con­tact with the inte­rior of the car result­ing in fewer injuries. Accord­ing to NHTSA, seat belt usage reduces the chance of being injured by up to 50 percent.
  • Seat belts spread the force of impact over larger parts of the body reduc­ing sever­ity of injuries. Injuries sus­tained when not wear­ing a seat belt can be up to five times greater.
  • Aver­age med­ical costs for belted dri­vers are 60 per­cent less than for unbelted drivers.

On Fri­day, Jan­u­ary 28, Road War­rior Colum­nist John Cichowski wrote a great arti­cle regard­ing the big news that teen dri­ving deaths are down 44% in 2010 and that it could be “attrib­uted to the May 1 teen dri­ving restric­tions that included an 11 p.m. cur­few, pas­sen­ger lim­its, a ban on hands-free cell­phone use, and a tiny, man­dated red bumper decal to iden­tify novice dri­vers under the state’s Grad­u­ated Dri­ver License law.”

You can read the full arti­cle HERE

Comments (0)

Fam­ily raises aware­ness of Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion and tex­ting risks on ABC’s Extreme Makeover: Home Edition

by Press Releases for U.S. Depart­ment of Transportation’s (USDOT)

WASHINGTON – U.S. Trans­porta­tion Sec­re­tary Ray LaHood (@RayLaHood) today released the lat­est video in the U.S. Depart­ment of Transportation’s (USDOT) “Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving series. The new video fea­tures the Brown fam­ily, whose 17-year-old daugh­ter, Alex, was killed in a 2009 crash because she was tex­ting while dri­ving on a rural road in Well­man, Texas. The fam­ily recently appeared on ABC’s Extreme Makeover: Home Edi­tion, rais­ing aware­ness of the Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion and the dan­gers of dis­tracted driving.

<div align=“center” style=“text-align=“center; padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;”>

WATCH: “Alex Brown, 17”


Watch on YouTube

Alex Brown wasn’t a sta­tis­tic – she was a beloved daugh­ter and a sis­ter, and her death left a hole in the heart of her fam­ily mem­bers and friends,” said Sec­re­tary LaHood. “I hope that every­one who hears the Brown fam­ily speak about their tragic loss will real­ize that no text mes­sage or phone call is worth the risk. Addi­tional media atten­tion, like ABC’s help­ing share the Browns’ story with the view­ers of Extreme Makeover: Home Edi­tion, is also vital.”

She’s a huge part of our lives that’s just gone,” said Jeanne Brown. “But maybe we can reach one young per­son or help keep some­one else’s daugh­ter from doing this.”

Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving” is a video series explor­ing the tragic con­se­quences of tex­ting and cell phone use while dri­ving. It fea­tures peo­ple from across the coun­try who have been injured or lost loved ones in dis­tracted dri­ving crashes. In 2009, nearly 5,500 peo­ple died and half a mil­lion were injured in acci­dents involv­ing a dis­tracted dri­ver. The series is part of Sec­re­tary LaHood’s effort to raise greater aware­ness about the dan­gers of dis­tracted driving.

USDOT is also encour­ag­ing oth­ers who would like to share their dis­tracted dri­ving expe­ri­ences to post videos on YouTube and email the links to: faces@distraction.gov.

The department’s cam­paign against dis­tracted dri­ving is a multi-modal effort that includes auto­mo­biles, trains, planes, and com­mer­cial vehicles.

The Fed­eral Rail­road Admin­is­tra­tion (FRA) issued a rule pro­hibit­ing rail employ­ees from using cell phones or other elec­tronic devices on the job fol­low­ing a Sep­tem­ber 2008 Metrolink crash in Chatsworth, Cal­i­for­nia that killed 25 people.

After a North­west flight crew dis­tracted by a lap­top over­shot their des­ti­na­tion by 150 miles, the Fed­eral Avi­a­tion Admin­is­tra­tion (FAA) advised air car­ri­ers to cre­ate and enforce poli­cies that limit dis­trac­tions in the cock­pit and keep pilots focused on trans­port­ing pas­sen­gers safely.

The Fed­eral Motor Car­rier Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (FMCSA) issued a rule pro­hibit­ing text mes­sag­ing while oper­at­ing a com­mer­cial motor vehi­cle in Sep­tem­ber 2010. In Decem­ber 2010, FMCSA issued a pro­posal to restrict the use of cell phones by com­mer­cial dri­vers while oper­at­ing. A rule­mak­ing pro­posed by the a href=“http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/” target=“blank”>Pipeline and Haz­ardous Mate­ri­als Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (PHMSA) in Sep­tem­ber 2010 to work in con­junc­tion with the FMCSA ban would restrict the use of elec­tronic devices by dri­vers dur­ing the oper­a­tion of a motor vehi­cle con­tain­ing haz­ardous mate­ri­als. The pub­lic is invited to com­ment on the pro­posed rulemaking.

To learn more about USDOT’s efforts to stop dis­tracted dri­ving, please visit www.distraction.gov.

PLEASE WATCH & SHARE: the entire “Faces of Dis­tracted Dri­ving” series @ www.distraction.gov/faces.
“Dis­tracted Dri­ving Kills. Safe Dri­ving Starts With YOU.”

The Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion (RAB) hon­ors Alex’s mem­ory by edu­cat­ing oth­ers about the dan­gers of tex­ting while dri­ving. Their web­site encour­ages oth­ers to share their dis­tracted dri­ving sto­ries and pledge online not to text while oper­at­ing a vehicle.

You can learn more about The Remem­ber Alex Brown Foun­da­tion at www.rememberalexbrownfoundation.org.

Remember Alex Brown - CLICK TO take the pledge to NOT text and drive

Remem­ber Alex Brown — CLICK TO take the pledge to NOT text and drive

by Press Releases for National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tion (NHTSA)

WALTHAM, MA – U.S. Trans­porta­tion Sec­re­tary Ray LaHood (@RayLaHood) and National High­way Traf­fic Safety Admin­is­tra­tor David Strick­land (@NHTSAgov) today took a first look at new Dri­ver Alco­hol Detec­tion Sys­tem for Safety (DADSS) tech­nol­ogy being devel­oped to pre­vent alcohol-impaired dri­vers from oper­at­ing their vehi­cles while under the influence.

Sec­re­tary LaHood and Admin­is­tra­tor Strick­land were joined by Shane Karr, vice pres­i­dent for Fed­eral Gov­ern­ment Affairs at the Alliance of Auto­mo­bile Man­u­fac­tur­ers, and Laura Dean Mooney (@maddnatlpres), national pres­i­dent of Moth­ers Against Drunk Dri­ving (MADD) (@maddonline), and JD Crouch, pres­i­dent of Qine­tiQ North America’s Tech­nol­ogy Solu­tions Group (@QinetiQNorthAm) for a demon­stra­tion of DADSS tech­nol­ogy at the Qine­tiQ lab where it is under devel­op­ment in Waltham, Massachusetts.

While still in the devel­op­men­tal stages, DADSS is seen as a poten­tial tool for keep­ing drunk dri­vers from being able oper­ate their car if their blood alco­hol con­cen­tra­tion is at or above the legal intox­i­ca­tion limit (.08 BAC or higher). The tech­nol­ogy could be vol­un­tar­ily installed as an option for new cars. One sys­tem under eval­u­a­tion deter­mines the blood alco­hol con­cen­tra­tion through a touch-based approach and another sys­tem uses a breath-based approach.

NHTSA research shows that dri­vers involved in fatal acci­dents with blood alco­hol lev­els above the .08 legal limit are eight times more likely to have had a prior con­vic­tion for impaired dri­ving than dri­vers who had no alco­hol in their bod­ies at the time of a wreck.

Drunk dri­ving con­tin­ues to be a national tragedy that need­lessly claims the lives of thou­sands of peo­ple on our high­ways each year,” said Sec­re­tary LaHood. “We need to put an end to it.”

MADD Pres­i­dent Laura Dean-Mooney, who was left a widow and sin­gle mother when a drunk dri­ver killed her hus­band, Mike Dean, wel­comed the progress of the DADSS research effort, say­ing, “Auto mak­ers have stepped up to help turn cars into the cure. This project has made sub­stan­tial progress and this tech­nol­ogy could one day be an impor­tant step in our efforts to elim­i­nate drunk dri­ving.”

DADSS is being devel­oped under a five-year, $10 mil­lion coop­er­a­tive ini­tia­tive between NHTSA and the Auto­mo­tive Coali­tion for Traf­fic Safety (ACTS), an indus­try group rep­re­sent­ing most of the world’s auto makers.

What we’re doing is devel­op­ing tech­nol­ogy that won’t inter­fere with sober dri­vers, will require vir­tu­ally no main­te­nance or upkeep and will have such pre­ci­sion that it only stops a dri­ver when their blood alco­hol con­tent is .08 BAC or higher, which is the ille­gal limit for drunk dri­ving in every state,” said Shane Karr. “Now that we have actual pro­to­types, a tremen­dous feat in itself, we’ll be work­ing to iden­tify the gaps in per­for­mance between these pro­to­types and the pre­cise stan­dards we’ve iden­ti­fied as true tech­nol­ogy require­ments. This will point the way for­ward for the next phase of research.”

The tech­nol­ogy we are see­ing here today could quite sim­ply sig­nal a new fron­tier in the fight against drunk dri­ving,” said NHTSA Admin­is­tra­tor Strickland.

The next stage of devel­op­ment, which would include prac­ti­cal demon­stra­tions of one or more of the alco­hol detec­tion tech­nolo­gies, could begin later this year.

What­ever the future holds for these advanced drunk dri­ving pre­ven­tion tech­nolo­gies, one thing remains clear; no tech­nol­ogy can, or should, ever replace a driver’s per­sonal respon­si­bil­ity not to drive drunk,” the Admin­is­tra­tor said.

In 2009, 10,839 peo­ple died nation­wide in crashes involv­ing a drunk dri­ver.
These deaths make up 32 per­cent of all fatal crashes.

• Click here for addi­tional infor­ma­tion about DADDs

• Click here for statistics:

By Megan DeMarco/Statehouse Bureau

Jerry McCrea/The Star-Ledger

New Jersey’s dri­ver safety laws make the Gar­den State one of the safest in the nation for motorists, a report released today finds.

The state ranks sec­ond only to the Dis­trict of Colum­bia, accord­ing to the high­way safety report released by Advo­cates for Auto and High­way Safety.

New Jer­sey had 583 fatal­i­ties related to auto acci­dents in 2009, and crashes cost the state $9.3 billion.

The states were ranked on laws address­ing seat belts and other pro­tec­tion for adults, dis­tracted driving/text mes­sag­ing, impaired dri­ving, teen dri­ving, and child pro­tec­tion laws.

New Jer­sey met almost every require­ment, except a law requir­ing 30–50 hours of super­vised
dri­ving for teenagers.

The state got half credit for the require­ment that teenage dri­vers be pro­hib­ited from dri­ving from at least 10 p.m to 5 a.m., and half credit for not requir­ing an igni­tion inter­lock for all drunken dri­ving offenders.

New Jer­sey is one of the highest-spending states when it comes to the finan­cial bur­den of car crashes, the report found. In New Jer­sey, $9.3 bil­lion goes toward the eco­nomic cost of vehi­cle crashes. Only Florida, Cal­i­for­nia, New York and Texas spend more.

Nation­wide, more than 33,800 peo­ple were killed in motor vehi­cle crashes in 2009, the report found, and more than 2.2 mil­lion peo­ple were injured.

Eleven per­cent of dri­vers involved in fatal crashes dur­ing the same time were teen dri­vers
between 15 and 20.

The report also found auto acci­dents sig­nif­i­cantly decrease dur­ing eco­nomic recessions.

(LOCAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS) are remind­ing motorists to always remove accu­mu­lated ice and snow from their vehi­cles before trav­el­ing on New Jersey’s roadways.

Motorists who fail to clear their vehi­cles of ice and snow before dri­ving can be cited and fined under an amended law, which became effec­tive Octo­ber 20, 2010. Prior to this change, a motorist could only receive a cita­tion if fail­ure to remove ice and snow from a vehi­cle resulted in injury to oth­ers or prop­erty damage.

Fines for vio­lat­ing the new law range from $25 to $75. No motor vehi­cle points will be assessed for this offense. If fail­ure to remove ice and snow results in injury or prop­erty dam­age, motorists face fines rang­ing from $200 to $1000, while com­mer­cial motor vehi­cle dri­vers face fines rang­ing from $500 to $1,500, for each offense.

In antic­i­pa­tion of inclement weather, motorists are encour­aged to:

  • Tune up and win­ter­ize their vehi­cles, as well as check the radi­a­tor, bat­tery, antifreeze, and all other fluid levels.
  • Check tire treads and replace them if they’re unsafe.
  • Check and replace wind­shield wiper blades if the rub­ber is cracked and/or brit­tle. Be sure to also check and refill the washer fluid reservoir.
  • Main­tain at least a half a tank of gas dur­ing the win­ter to pre­vent the fuel line from freezing.

Motorists should also keep a win­ter dri­ving “safety kit” in their vehi­cles that is eas­ily acces­si­ble in the event of an emer­gency. The kit should include: an ice scraper/brush; shovel; jumper cables or bat­tery starter; warm blan­ket; sand, salt or cat lit­ter (for trac­tion in ice and snow); de-icer; safety flares/warning devices; flash­light and new bat­ter­ies; extra wind­shield washer fluid; cell phone with a charged spare bat­tery; water and non-perishable food (i.e. gra­nola or pro­tein bars); and, paper tow­els or a cloth.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion on win­ter dri­ving, as well as a vari­ety of traf­fic safety issues, motorists can visit the New Jer­sey Divi­sion of High­way Traf­fic Safety’s web site, at www.njsaferoads.com

Comments (0)

Dur­ing driver’s ed defen­sive dri­ving, the police offi­cer talked to us about how to deal with deer in the road– and every­one I know was shocked by the answer. So, I thought this would be inter­est­ing to write a post about!

Oh Deer… Did I just make a really bad pun?
Yes, I did, but it was a rele­phant one. :)

Quick Quiz: (Kind of like the ones you’d get in school, but with answers that may actu­ally prove directly use­ful in life one day, as opposed to expo­nen­tial– log­a­rith­mic con­ver­sions). While you’re dri­ving, a deer has just jumped out of nowhere (or at least, out of the trees on the side of the road) and is now right in the mid­dle of your lane and approach­ing fast.

What do you do?

  1. swerve to the side to try and avoid it
  2. slam on the breaks
  3. ease off the gas and coast right through

If you chose choice a, you’ve now put your­self at risk of crash­ing into the trees or any other obsta­cles to the right, or into oncom­ing cars in the next lane. Not pretty.

If you chose choice b, you’re prob­a­bly going off of what would be your instinc­tive reac­tion. While you may try to brake as quickly as pos­si­ble so as to avoid a col­li­sion, if the deer’s within your stop­ping dis­tance (usu­ally around 100 feet, depend­ing on the rate of travel and the weight of the car), you’re still going to slam into it.

Accord­ing to a cou­ple laws of physics and some­thing called momen­tum, such sud­den force on the breaks will cause your car to tilt for­ward slightly, hit­ting the deer in its legs. In real– life sit­u­a­tions, the deer will not mirac­u­lously stay still or fling clear of the car; rather, it will then pro­ceed to crash straight through your wind­shield and may pos­si­bly, as in one true story, land in the back seat still some­what alive after hav­ing taken out the dri­ver and the pas­sen­ger rid­ing shot­gun. Not fun.

So, as heart­less as it might sound, choice c is in fact the best choice to make if you see a deer within the length of your stop­ping dis­tance. If you ease off the gas, the car will slow down to min­i­mize the force of impact and you’ll hit the deer in its torso, fling­ing it back onto the road rather than through the wind­shield. Since you’ll be hit­ting the deer at such a dis­tance whether you hit the brakes or cruise through, it’s bet­ter to make sure that you’re not hurt as well as the poor deer.
:(


Jenni K.

Given the fact most kids wear hel­mets while bike rid­ing, it prob­a­bly seems sur­pris­ing to some that wear­ing a hel­met while ski­ing is not required in New Jer­sey for teenages.

A bipar­ti­san bill co-sponsored by Assem­bly­man Anthony M. Bucco, R-Boonton, is try­ing to change that. The bill, which was released from com­mit­tee last week, would require any­one under the age of 18 to wear a hel­met while ski­ing or snowboarding.

A recent study by…read more…